PFC Forums
February 06, 2012, 11:41:53 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   PFC News    Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: U.S. escalating covert operations against Iran  (Read 257 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BrankoWasTheBEST
Valued Member
****

Community Standing 4
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Join Date: Apr, 2008



View Profile
« on: June 29, 2008, 03:54:46 PM »

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. congressional leaders agreed late last year to President George W. Bush's funding request for a major escalation of covert operations against Iran aimed at destabilizing its leadership, according to a report in The New Yorker magazine published online on Sunday.

The article by reporter Seymour Hersh, from the magazine's July 7 and 14 issue, centres around a highly classified Presidential Finding signed by Bush which by U.S. law must be made known to Democratic and Republican House and Senate leaders and ranking members of the intelligence committees.

"The Finding was focused on undermining Iran's nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change," the article cited a person familiar with its contents as saying, and involved "working with opposition groups and passing money."

Hersh has written previously about possible administration plans to go to war to stop Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons, including an April 2006 article in the New Yorker that suggested regime change in Iran, whether by diplomatic or military means, was Bush's ultimate goal.

Funding for the covert escalation, for which Bush requested up to $400 million (200 million pounds), was approved by congressional leaders, according to the article, citing current and former military, intelligence and congressional sources.

Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. U.S. Special Operations Forces have been conducting crossborder operations from southern Iraq since last year, the article said.

These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of "high-value targets" in Bush's war on terrorism, who may be captured or killed, according to the article.

But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which include the Central Intelligence Agency, have now been significantly expanded, the article said, citing current and former officials.

Many of these activities are not specified in the new finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature, it said.

Among groups inside Iran benefiting from U.S. support is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People's Resistance Movement, according to former CIA officer Robert Baer. Council on Foreign Relations analyst Vali Nasr described it to Hersh as a vicious organization suspected of links to al Qaeda.

The article said U.S. support for the dissident groups could prompt a violent crackdown by Iran, which could give the Bush administration a reason to intervene.

None of the Democratic leaders in Congress would comment on the finding, the article said. The White House, which has repeatedly denied preparing for military action against Iran, and the CIA also declined comment.

The United States is leading international efforts to rein in Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, although Washington concedes Iran has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian uses.

Link
Logged

... In Persia first arises that light which shines itself and illuminates what is around... The principle of development begins with the history of Persia; this constitutes therefore the begining of history.             Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
BrankoWasTheBEST
Valued Member
****

Community Standing 4
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Join Date: Apr, 2008



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2008, 10:07:13 AM »

Threat has significantly decreased. Apparantly the blood thirsty warmongers who get their sexual gratification by the murder of innocents, namely Bush, Cheni, Rumsfeld and other Republican voters do not have the backing of the military and the sensible Americans.

The most interesting aspect of the latest Seymour Hersh warning that the Bush administration is gearing up for a fight in Iran (or over Iran) was this claim about a meeting Defence Secretary Robert Gates had with Democratic Senators:

"Gates warned of the consequences if the Bush Administration staged a pre-emptive strike on Iran, saying, as the senator recalled, 'We'll create generations of jihadists, and our grandchildren will be battling our enemies here in America.' Gates's comments stunned the Democrats at the lunch, and another senator asked whether Gates was speaking for Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney.

"Gates's answer, the senator told me, was 'Let's just say that I'm here speaking for myself.' (A spokesman for Gates confirmed that he discussed the consequences of a strike at the meeting, but would not address what he said, other than to dispute the senator's characterization.)"

So Gates and the US top brass will veto a strike. If Gates threatened to resign he would win. Is he gutsier than Powell? That's the question.

Can he withstand the pressure and the selective reporting of threat assessments etc etc? Of course, if he were wrong and Cheney were right - if Iran built a bomb under his watch and used it - history might not smile on him.


Link
Logged

... In Persia first arises that light which shines itself and illuminates what is around... The principle of development begins with the history of Persia; this constitutes therefore the begining of history.             Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
aliirooni
Full Member
**

Community Standing 2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Join Date: May, 2008


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 03:04:40 AM »

US already made a huge mistake by invading Iraq and attacking Iran would only be another huge mistake knowing that Iran's military is alot more capable than Iraq and US needs to spend some major $$$ to get anything done and that is something that US can not afford right now.

However Zionists are very persistent they will keep pushing until they get their wish. And IRI officials are unsurprisingly incompetent to avert this because they are ideologically driven and they have a very screwed up idiology.  I personally like to help Palestinians to have a better future but not at expense of my own people specially NOT the IRI way which has only escalated violence in the region. Specailly not when the Arab countries have turned their back on them too!

Anyways I suppose AN will keep talking shit about Israel and I hate to say it Israelis have their own tactics and very good at it too and one way or another they will get Bush or next president to attack Iran.  Embarrassed

Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!